![]()
Editorials Blog Index | SocioSphere™ | MarkFoster.NETwork™
>>For all the world to see, a 41-year-old woman, who has committed no crime, will die of dehydration and starvation in the longest public execution in American history.<< Irrespective of one's views on this issue, the above statement is totally absurd. In the United States alone, life support, which (in Florida) is legally defined as including a feeding tube, is disconnected from thousands of people everyday. My mother was in a permanent vegetative state and comatose; and my sister and I authorized her to be disconnected from life support this past October (in accordance with her expressed wishes in her living will). It took her about a week to die. The length of the process differs in each case. The only reason we are hearing about this situation is due to the long-term dispute between her husband and parents. Aside from that, the particulars are very common. It is unfortunate that Ms. Schiavo did not leave a living will. However, the courts accepted her husband's testimony that she would not have wanted to continue under these circumstances. What else can be expect from our government? The U.S. is a society of laws, not of anarchy. It is strange that some of the same people, such as anti-abortionist Randall Terry, who often argue against judicial activism are, in this case, now demanding it. In other words, it is not judicial activism which these hypocrites oppose. It is judicial activism which differs from their values. posted at 07:46:21 PM by Dr. Mark A. Foster |
What has not, by and large, been discussed by the media is that the whole Terri Schievo situation is being led by some of the main proponents of Christian Reconstructionism orDominion Theology ("Christianism"), such as Randall Terry. It is a vehicle for placing the U.S. government into the hands of fundamentalist Christians and running it according to biblical (usually understood as Old Testament) law.
So many social conservatives continually scream against "activist judges.' Now they want judges to be activists, to violate state statutes, because it suits their agendas.
This whole issue is about the attempted take-over of American society by Christian reconstructionists, like Randall Terry.
The Terri Schiavo case is certainly a difficult one for many people. Nonetheless, I suspect there is good will on all sides.
What it all comes down to, in my view, is whether a person has a right to refuse medical care, which includes the use of a feeding tube. Ideally, this preference should be expressed in a living will or an advanced directive.
In this case, since there was no living will, the courts had to determine what Terri Schiavo wanted through legal testimony. The finding was that Ms. Schiavo would not have wished to receive medical treatment under present circumstances.
Contrary to what is being claimed by some persons, this situation has nothing to do with the rights of the disabled. It more closer approximates a Jehovah's Witness who, on religious grounds, refuses a blood transplant which would save her or his life.
The important question, as I see it, relates to whether any of us would want to live in a medical dictatorship in which persons are compelled to receive treatment.
Species are names for categories. What may have remained constant throughout the evolutionary processes is God's names for categories of beings. Thus, it is a category which cannot become another category (irrespective of appearances). However, since those categories refer to a divine naming process, they have no direct relationship with what scientists study as evolution.
Interesting verse in countering incarnationism:
"... yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist."
-- 1 Corinthians 8:6, English Standard Version
Sent to CNN's American Morning (question of the day):
Banning songs from the broadcast media because someone did something stupid is guilt by association.
Was Kojak banned because, a few decades ago, a kid in Florida was acquitted of murder after blaming his crime on watching that show?
No, if a song is banned, and I am not sure it is a good idea, it should be because of the song itself, not because of some alleged association with violent behavior.
Adam and Eve are a parable of the human condition. We are not perfect. We struggle with issues of good and evil.
I cherish my own imperfection (living outside of the Garden of Eden). Life as a perfect person would be very boring and unchalllenging.
The following email was a response to the question of the day on CNN's Daybreak.
It was read (with slight paraphrasing) by Chad Myers.
------
I am a
community college professor, and I see some of the best and worst products of our
local high schools.
For years now, the American educational system has moved toward a lowest-common-denominator model. Standards have been reduced to supposedly accommodate diverse populations.
I would like to see standards raised, "grade inflation" reduced, and a Japanese (and European) system of rigorous testing instituted.
The problem is that there are powerful people in America's secondary schools with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Any changes will not come easily.
Sincerely yours, Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. • Professor of Sociology
Johnson County
Community College, Overland Park, Kansas
913-469-8500 x3376 • Fax: 913-469-2589
• mfoster@jccc.edu
My fifteen websites: http://MarkFoster.net • Office: GEB
151-D
"Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburger." --- Abbie Hoffman
Copyright © 2002- Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. All rights reserved.
|