From a discussion in a Paltalk chatroom. I am Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb:
Paltalk: This is a G rated voice room intended for a General Audience including
minors. Offensive language is not permitted.
Paltalk: Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb, welcome to the room Belief is Belief do you SEE.
KayHardy: welcome moshe aron
Valerie May Phillips: are we getting it though phil?
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: ty
Phil Monty: yes valerie
lori_2: hi moshe aron ben...
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Hi, Lori
Gene-sis: yes JD
devenroy: lol jd
Gene-sis: hi moshe
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Howdy, Gene
Valerie May Phillips: I see sometimes people want me to elaborate.
Gene-sis: yep
Valerie May Phillips: due to not understanding me
Valerie May Phillips: and I end up justifying myself
Gene-sis: i type break the circle.......
Phil Monty: intellectualisation...is a cool word
Gene-sis: hi truth
Truthseeker_38: hi
KayHardy: welcome truthseeker
Gene-sis: (kevin?)?
michael a_1: wc truthseeker
lori_2: hi truthseeker
devenroy: wc truth
Truthseeker_38: thanks
KayHardy: Valerie )))
Gene-sis: just like me )) valerie
Valerie May Phillips: lol
Phil Monty: yes sir
Valerie May Phillips: I don't like the mic today.
Valerie May Phillips: so, I am using it.
Valerie May Phillips: lol
devenroy: wc swan
SwanSongstress: hi all
SwanSongstress: ty dev
Gene-sis: swanSongSTRESS
michael a_1: hi swan
SwanSongstress: hi philllll
Koji JP: Swan, Ebbing ?
Gene-sis: Ebbing
devenroy: wc ebbing?
michael a_1: hi ebbing
KayHardy: www.selftransformation.org/ Edward Jones website which contains the glossary
Valerie May Phillips: lol......hi swanny
Ebbing_tide: g'day folks
KayHardy: welcome swansong and Ebbing
Ebbing_tide: swannnnnnnnnnnny
Valerie May Phillips: hi ebbing
SwanSongstress: hi michael and koji and gene]ebbingggggggggggggggggggg
SwanSongstress: ty kay
SwanSongstress: hi val
Ebbing_tide: hiya koji
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Kay, interesting. Is this room connected with Edward's
work?
Koji JP: hi hi
lori_2: hi ebbing
Ebbing_tide: hiya dev
KayHardy: Yes Moshe
Ebbing_tide: hi michael
Ebbing_tide: hiya kay
devenroy: how r u ebbing?
Ebbing_tide: hi val
Valerie May Phillips: visitors
Koji JP: distortion = telling the lie
Gene-sis: AFK - Listening - bbl (maybe)
KayHardy: yes Koji
Ebbing_tide: hi lori
Ebbing_tide: great dev thanks
devenroy: lol
Phil Monty: thinking errors
Ebbing_tide: hiya phil
SwanSongstress: o mlord
Phil Monty: hi ebbs
devenroy: u need another glossary of words for it jd?
lori_2: hi swan
SwanSongstress: i dont jd
SwanSongstress: hi loriiii
fred_kent: afk
Gene-sis: jeffrey your looking ))
Gene-sis: bbl
Phil Monty: hi swanny
SwanSongstress: brb
Gene-sis: i am a liar
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: What is correct?
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Who determines it?
fred_kent: back
Valerie May Phillips: got to go.
Valerie May Phillips: bye
KayHardy: see you Valerie
michael a_1: bye valerie
Elliott_T: JD: Kay doesn't think
Ebbing_tide: hiya elliot
Phil Monty: Kay: from my conditioning
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: IMO, thinking *itself* is distortion (or distorts what
exists - whatever that is)
KayHardy: Yes Moshe
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Nothing is thinking turned in on itself, i.e., rejected
Ebbing_tide: w/b dev
devenroy: ty
Phil Monty: can you explain that further Moshe?
Phil Monty: May*
Koji JP: there is time change tomorrow ? the turning to summer time ?
JD9587: already changed here koji
Koji JP: oh really, Jeff
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Phil, okay. If I think of something, then I think of something
else, I can recognize the impermanence fo my thoughts
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: The thinking becomes nothing when it confronts itself
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: And dissolves
Elliott_T: yes
Ebbing_tide: that's what I see
Ebbing_tide: new definitions
Phil Monty: an experiment?...cool
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: There is no way to avoid being stuck in words. Even the
*idea* of avoiding "stuck" is grammatical. Instead, one should, IMO, begin
to face one's own limitations
Phil Monty: yes moshe
Ebbing_tide: I see all words can be played out many different ways
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Facing one's limitations -> no longer taking one's
embeddedness in language too seriously
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: That, IMO, is freedom
KayHardy: welcome muppet
Ebbing_tide: not new
Ebbing_tide: old
KayHardy: ill answer on mic
Phil Monty: always???
JD9587: yes.. hear it live on phantomradio.co.uk you have been warned
Koji JP: when we get aware that we are stuck in language, we become free from language
Phil Monty: lol
JD9587: why let notricious on mic......
JD9587: ty
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Koji, yes - at least one has the insight to begin discovering
freedom
Gene-sis: good question JD
Gene-sis: back
KayHardy: yes Koji and you are free then to look for yourself
Gene-sis: Koji....yes Kay
Ebbing_tide: yep
Ebbing_tide: hiya sea
michael a_1: hi seawnds
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Belief systems are linguistic - to be transcended
Seawnds: hi ya ebb
Seawnds: hi michael
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: through intentional contradiction
Gene-sis: don't even Mention differant laguages....
Gene-sis: wb deven
devenroy: ty
Gene-sis: yw
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: IMO, the way to become free from language, even while
remaining in it, is through intentional contradiction
Koji JP: If we believe that we are not trapped in language, we keep being robots.
Gene-sis: yes PHIL
Ebbing_tide: yes phil
Ebbing_tide: yes
devenroy: language dont have any power to trap anyone
devenroy: its just like saying getting trapped by teddy bear
Phil Monty: ok
Koji JP: look at the glossary by self, and make action.
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Languages have no power, but we attribute power (in our
minds) to languages by defining our experiences through them
Elliott_T: So why increase it?
Gene-sis: yes Kay - and not only in this room
KayHardy: Yes by believing in them Moshe
devenroy: yes elliot
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: By reifying them
Gene-sis: all over the planet
devenroy: exactly ebbing
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: The reification of language is the problem, IMO
Gene-sis: whats reification.....?
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: To reify is to treat something as real
Gene-sis: moshe
Gene-sis: ah. ty Moshe
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Intentional contradiction can combat reification, IMO
Ebbing_tide: yes through ones own experience
Gene-sis: afk - bbl - maybe (listening on speakers)
Phil Monty: Kay: logically or emotionally...or something else?
Ebbing_tide: words are pointers
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: language games - like Wittgenstein said
Gene-sis: yes Ebbing (also)
KayHardy: Ist that a yes or a no?
Phil Monty: Moshe: and Sipir and Wolfe????
fred_kent: bthoem
Phil Monty: sapir*
Gene-sis: words are not a game to me.... words Create every thing around me
devenroy: if u go that down then u can make another glossary for it
KayHardy: Yes Lillian the speaking of them
Gene-sis: yes Kay ))
devenroy: yes ebbing
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Words do not point to anything. People point to things.
Words are the traps which lead us to believe that the objects being pointed to are
real
Gene-sis: whoof whoof (BIG DOG?)
Phil Monty: by creating a commonality of interpretation of words..isn't that conditioning???
devenroy: not really
devenroy: u cannt get lost
Gene-sis: yes Ebbing
Ebbing_tide: yes phil, and we are all conditioned into language
Ebbing_tide: fine line
Gene-sis: absolutly so Kay Hardy ))
Gene-sis: as fine as a razor blade Ebbing : )
Ebbing_tide: kay looking for oneself one would be able to see the interpretation
Ebbing_tide: in the looking
Gene-sis: the line between life and death..... Ebbing ))
KayHardy: that is it Lillian
Ebbing_tide: lilsy?
Gene-sis: yes Jannett ?
Ebbing_tide: I don't see a word as a matter of life or death
Ebbing_tide: we all use language
Gene-sis: ok Ebby
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: If one says that words point to "things," isn't
one then implying a direct connection between the two. If so, isn't being trapped
permanent?
Elliott_T: brb
KayHardy: Its not about interpretation Devenroy
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: The trap comes from seeing the words as real
devenroy: just like word trying!
devenroy: yes
KayHardy: Yes Moshe the words arent real....what they point to may or may not be
Elliott_T: back
devenroy: words are real too isnt it moshe
KayHardy: wb Elliot
Phil Monty: IMO: it's great that we intreprete the same word differently......it
means we are not robots???
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Kay, IMO, nothing we point to is real. Even if, in itself,
it may have some existence, by pointing it, one fictionalizes it
Ebbing_tide: words are conditioning yes
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: devenroy, IMO, nothing we point to, and nothing used to
point, is real
Gene-sis: yes KAY HARDY ))
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: I agree you are real, but when I point to you, I fictionalize
you (impose my own expectations and views on you)
Phil Monty: Kay: if you are real...how can you be dead (as defined by Edward)????
Gene-sis: yes MOshe (unless we don't)
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Gene, or unless we constantly contradict our pointings
Elliott_T: that's the word game
Gene-sis: ?? didn't get that Moshe.....
Seawnds: that's life though
Gene-sis: contradict?
Ebbing_tide: if we took on onother interpretation would be robotic
Seawnds: we come from different cultures, different backgrounds, etc
Gene-sis: whats contradict......
Ebbing_tide: anothers
KayHardy: yes Ebbing...it isnt about interpretation
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Gene, I mean that language is just a game, and we should
accept multiple language games - even contradictory ones - and use them
michael a_1: good nite everyone
Ebbing_tide: then the words is meaningless
Gene-sis: language is a game? (i don't see that)
KayHardy: Fred are you here?
Ebbing_tide: without interpretation kay
Seawnds: hi ya dev
Gene-sis: phone
KayHardy: Is it Ebbing?
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Gene, language is just a play on words
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: But I remember discussion this subject with Edward, and
he always thought I went too far, but such is the bane of my existence. ?
Phil Monty: a cup has many interpretations or stories....that's great otherwise
we would be robots...as devonroy suggested
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: *discussing
Gene-sis: done
Phil Monty: lol...Elliot
Ebbing_tide: could you speak with them on the phone??
Gene-sis: wb devenroy & Lillian
Phil Monty: lol
Gene-sis: auh........
Ebbing_tide: yes it is
Gene-sis: YES!!!!!
devenroy: but glossary is just that hardy
Ebbing_tide: it is thought
Gene-sis: Kay
Phil Monty: Kay: that was conditioned humour...you just used
Gene-sis: me also Kay
Gene-sis: am not even speaking )))
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: We come to see language as real, and then we order our
experiences based on that language - usually entirely unaware that, with other language
games, our experiences would be entirely different
Gene-sis: hahaha LOL
devenroy: yes...
Seawnds: how else would you communicate, ebb?
Gene-sis: <~~~SIGH (big sigh)
devenroy: lets play scrabble
SwanSongstress: back
devenroy: lol
SwanSongstress: yes ebb
Gene-sis: wb swan
KayHardy: wb swansong
devenroy: wb swan
Seawnds: hi ya swanny
devenroy: exactly ebbing
SwanSongstress: all of this verbal speaking and hearing is interpretive
SwanSongstress: hi seaaaa
KayHardy: thats the question to ask yourself Ebbing
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Words are not perceived. They are used
Gene-sis: OFF COURSE.......
Gene-sis: m Moshe.....
Seawnds: yes , there are very different senses of humor
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: m?
KayHardy: thats cause your nuts too Phil
Gene-sis: umm.... Moshe
Ebbing_tide: if we didn't interpret we could say gooolama glob as the interpretation
is necussary
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Oh, okay. I thought you had something in mind with the
"m"
annabdm: hey guys!good night
Ebbing_tide: isn't necessary
Gene-sis: was looking at what you typed Moshe
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: lol
devenroy: why to say it?
Ebbing_tide: robotic kay
devenroy: why to experiment on such thing?
SwanSongstress: not on edwards foundation kay
SwanSongstress: exactly dev
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Being robotic comes from taking words too seriously
Phil Monty: I do Kay.......sometimes it may take 5 minutes though..not a year
KayHardy: so you already know Ebbing
devenroy: its just like following bibilical terms
SwanSongstress: right phil
devenroy: its another bible
devenroy: lol@ebbing
devenroy: hahahahhaa
SwanSongstress: its possible to look at it , consider it, use it and discard it
Gene-sis: LOVE........ the most missused word on the planet today
SwanSongstress: misused
devenroy: thats another belief gene
Gene-sis: ty swan
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Everything is a mush of nothing. Words give the illusion
of order
devenroy: 1
Ebbing_tide: great
Gene-sis: for correcting spelling - swanny ))
Phil Monty: adequately beautiful
devenroy: lol swan
devenroy: just to experiment*
KayHardy: The only Edwardian I ever met is you Swan ))))
Gene-sis: bibles, dusty here swan - as for doing IT..... i wonder : )
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: There is no such thing as "the Bible." The Bible
is itself a reification of diverse languages used by many different authors
Phil Monty: I wanna become a Hardian...lol
Gene-sis: yes Kay
devenroy: swan never proposed to look into edwardian glossary hardy
KayHardy: $1,00000000.00 dollars Phil or a cd??
Phil Monty: lol
Ebbing_tide: yes swan it's a belief system one takes on
Gene-sis: is it possible to ACTUALY do IT?....... i wonder....
KayHardy: no need to be sorry swan
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: There are thousands of religions in the world. Why pick
one out of those thousands and privilege it by trying it?
Gene-sis: Love....... again.......
Ebbing_tide: gene you can take any word and experience many different interpretations
Seawnds: ahh . .the Edwardian Bible
Ebbing_tide: experience
Gene-sis: Ebbing i have......... used to interpretate everything
SwanSongstress: im sorta proud of coining "Edwardian"
SwanSongstress: its become quite popular
SwanSongstress: i think that makes me special
Ebbing_tide: lilsy, are you interpreting my words?
SwanSongstress: ?
Gene-sis: now i Listen - if i hear i hear........ if i don't i don't........ Ebbing
: )
devenroy: i also use it hardy
devenroy: ebbing too
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: The term Eduardian is used by other people to refer to
an entirely different construct
Ebbing_tide: so how is it you hear lilsy?
Paltalk: ====SECURITY BULLETIN!=======
Paltalk will never send emails with attachments! NEVER open any attachemnts unless
you are absolutely sure they are free of viruses and trojans! DONT BE FOOLED by
fake 'support' letters or surveys that claim to be from PalTalk! PalTalk will NEVER
request personal informaion in an email unless YOU contact us with a problem with
your account first. Always check the header of any email that claims it is coming
from PalTalk.
SwanSongstress: lol
Gene-sis: no Ebbing i am not - i am responding to YOU Ebbing : )
SwanSongstress: thats why i used all those verbs kay
devenroy: we say edwardian but that doesnt mean me ebbing and swan are edwardians
SwanSongstress: for YOU thats what its about kay
Ebbing_tide: gene then what am I saying?
Seawnds: so we are born "knowing"
love-ology: d a shower
Ebbing_tide: ooops lilsy
devenroy: wc love
love-ology: hiya
Ebbing_tide: naturally it would kay
love-ology: dev grabbed me lol
SwanSongstress: exactly kay....the way edward "speaks it" is plenty of
reason to take it with a grain
Ebbing_tide: any interpretation can be seen if looked at hard enough
devenroy: yes u missed my angelic touch love
devenroy: lol
SwanSongstress: every word youre speaking is a word someone else "wrote"
and created kay
love-ology: lol
devenroy: lol@elliott
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Glossaries are okay, as long as they are not taken seriously
SwanSongstress: lol
devenroy: hahahahaaa
KayHardy: Yes Moshe...not something to be believed in
Ebbing_tide: yes swan, almost all words are second hand
devenroy: nicely said
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: right
Seawnds: a religious fanatic . . an Edwardian fanatic . .lol
devenroy: lol yes seawns
SwanSongstress: and they are wonderful SECOND HAND ME DOWNS
JD9587: Kay..we need to get these people high
SwanSongstress: aint they?
KayHardy: maybe JD
JD9587: they are not comforming
SwanSongstress: JD we need to get kay high
JD9587: damn them!
KayHardy: they are JD conforming to conditioning
Ebbing_tide: yes
Gene-sis: ah..........nothingness........
Ebbing_tide: yes
Gene-sis: hehe
JD9587: dont worry Kay. we are transformed. they will come around in time
Seawnds: yes, how in the world do we escape reality
JD9587: papa Jones will save them
JD9587: he died 4 times
Seawnds: and how long can we stay in nothingness
JD9587: for you swan
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: I agree, Phil. However, I think one can approach it through
intentional contradiction (as a discipline)
devenroy: wc reiki
Gene-sis: coming from there Phil .......
reikispirit: ty devenroy
Phil Monty: ok
JD9587: hello reiki
Seawnds: hi reiki
reikispirit: hello JD
JD9587: have you heard the good news?
Gene-sis: might be here anymoment now Phil : )
reikispirit: hello seawnds
devenroy: wc nina
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: For instance, I belong to about 30 different (very different)
religions, and I actively practice several of them
reikispirit: hello everyone
devenroy: how r u nina
Gene-sis: hello PHIL!!!!!!!!
reikispirit: what good news JD?
nina_infinite: fine ty
devenroy: cool
JD9587: papa Jones died for you
Gene-sis: am here now Phil
Phil Monty: ebbing: once you use thought or language...we are being conditioned
reikispirit: lol JD not for me he didnt but for himself maybe
devenroy: we all?
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: The pluralism between conditioned and transformed is itself
a linguistic trap
Gene-sis: yep Kay
Ebbing_tide: not a robot
JD9587: allow me to perform a reiki massage
devenroy: i m not
Gene-sis: YES KAY!!!!!!!!
Ebbing_tide: a robot is a belief
Phil Monty: Moshe: the other domain....is a paradox.....imo
reikispirit: no thanks JD I will stay fully clothed that is not what reiki is a
massage...ahahaha
Ebbing_tide: we may act according to that of a robot, and yet we are not robots
Gene-sis: auh KAY HARDY I AM ))
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Phil, but even the use of the word "domain"
is reification
devenroy: yes indded ebbing robot is belief
Gene-sis: yes Kay shut up ))))))))))
Gene-sis: hahaha LOL
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: We cannot avoid reification - but we can contradict it
JD9587: lol reiki. after speaking with andrea about it further, she may have combined
reiki and massage as alternative treatments
KayHardy: okay we are all robots except for Devenroy
Phil Monty: yes moshe..I agree...I am restricted in the words I am conditioned by
Gene-sis: yes
Gene-sis: hahah LOL
reikispirit: ahahaha yep JD
JD9587: two different things being spoken about and she combined them me thinks'
KayHardy: welcome reiki....did I say that?
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: I would say that the restriction is taking the words as
real. However, words themselves have no power
Koji JP: by actually speaking language, can we create energy ?
SwanSongstress: damn straight he does
Ebbing_tide: programming
devenroy: yes seawnds
Gene-sis: no i don't think so Seawnds
SwanSongstress: its CLASSIC conditioning
KayHardy: I do Koji
Koji JP: cool Kay
JD9587: interesting that they were talking about it at a workers compensation conference
KayHardy: terrible?
Phil Monty: Power is language..."Michael Fawcalt"...if we allow it to
be
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: If we have Edwardian, does that mean we have an Edward
I? ?
SwanSongstress: one example of the outlandish contradictions that give reason to
take his dogma with a grain
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Phil, I am a Foucaultian
Seawnds: so . . . doesn't Edward condition those attending his room?
Phil Monty: Power = Transmitter + Receiver
reikispirit: yes some are being licensed through their states though it is required
and if a massage therapist then they have to be licensed then doing reiki they have
to as well...I am glad to see states requiring this to keep the rift raft out of
reiki..
SwanSongstress: yep,sea
devenroy: yes indeed seawnds
devenroy: i give u an example for it
Seawnds: ty swanny . . you are so sensible . . . swanny and dev
devenroy: which is real too
Phil Monty: ok Moshe....I see that now
Gene-sis: yes Ebb...Edward uses the Paltalk Program.....
SwanSongstress: sensible is a horrible thing to be i n edwardianism, sea
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Edward is not a Foucaultian - though he comes close in
some areas - which is why he and I have differed
Gene-sis: wb Fred
Seawnds: lol lol swanny
KayHardy: wb Fred with hat ?
devenroy: wb fred
Gene-sis: got ya Hat Fred
Phil Monty: yes Moshe...he talks about the 5 linguistic acts
SwanSongstress: hi mark
JD9587: night Kay
devenroy: let me interpret what phone saying "pick me up damn it"
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Yes
Gene-sis: Moshe - have added you to my pal list
KayHardy: see you JD
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: ty, Gene
devenroy: wc mark
SwanSongstress: lol dev
Gene-sis: yw
Gene-sis: yes KAY!!!!!!!!
SwanSongstress: you mean like use the words he prescribes, kay?
devenroy: u know alot hardy
Seawnds: ? i feel conditioning going on
devenroy: lol
Phil Monty: Freddie has a golf hat on
SwanSongstress: now THAT is called "justification" kay
SwanSongstress: (word of the day)
SwanSongstress: \justification for conditioning
SwanSongstress: lol
Koji JP: Thank you Kay.
Phil Monty: c'ya Kay...TC
Ebbing_tide: not just in that room, in life itself
Seawnds: hi ya Fred
devenroy: i m next ebbing
KayHardy: Goodnight everyone ?
Seawnds: ahh . . the 19th hole, eh
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Good night, Kay
devenroy: goodnight hardy
Gene-sis: nite Love
Ebbing_tide: okay dev
Gene-sis: Kay love
Seawnds: yes dev
Seawnds: exactly
Seawnds: my point
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Several people in this room would know me by my other
nic
Seawnds: yes, you are being "conditioned"
reikispirit: there is not conditioning in there devenroy...
Seawnds: that's the feeling i get . . .
Gene-sis: oooooooooh DEVEN??? you need to be "LET BE???
reikispirit: he doesnt say to follow him or even believe what he says
devenroy: then why dot me for responding text?
devenroy: lol
Seawnds: yes, Ebb . . .now you start saying "perfect"
Seawnds: you've been "conditioned" that way
Seawnds: good point, ebb
SwanSongstress: and the fact is, those who DO NOT succumb to his conditioning, use
his words, not use words he doesnt, etc, is labelled as one who is "dead"
and someone who "already knows everything" etc etc
boris badinov: good evening comrads
reikispirit: I dont know devenroy that is something you have toi speak with him
about
devenroy: yes seawnds
devenroy: thats why i use perfect* like this
devenroy: lol
Seawnds: exactly swanny
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: All discourses, or texts, are driven by power. Finding
that speakers/writers wish to attach power to their words should not be surprising
devenroy: he is too old to listen reiki
SwanSongstress: change of color again
SwanSongstress: everybody copies me
SwanSongstress: lol
devenroy: wc hidden
Seawnds: I'd like Phil's read on this
Gene-sis: ty All - see ya later maybe (unless i don't) Take care - perfect life
to All
SwanSongstress: gene
boris badinov: copykat comrad
SwanSongstress: another example
Ebbing_tide: yes programming
SwanSongstress: the way she said goodbye is copied
Ebbing_tide: lol
fred_kent: lol
Seawnds: so a room that detests condition is actually conditioning
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Word Perfect has been supplanted by Microsoft Word ?
SwanSongstress: its robotic to a point of embarrassment
Seawnds: conditioning actually
SwanSongstress: yes me too phil
boris badinov: if you were not conditioned swan you wouldnt come into this room?
Ebbing_tide: yes it's a belief
Ebbing_tide: if it wasn't a belief it wouldn't be stated
Seawnds: It's Edward's belief that there's no love in the world
Seawnds: isn't that a belief
Ebbing_tide: yes
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Yes, we cannot escape beliefs. We can only deconstruct
them. That is another difference I had with Edward
Ebbing_tide: yes
Seawnds: i agree . . .beliefs can't be escaped
boris badinov: is this all about you moshe?
Ebbing_tide: yes the moment it is labeled it is no longer
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Boris, maybe or maybe not. What do you think?
boris badinov: me me me i i i i thats all your hear no one is conditioned here
Ebbing_tide: see the conditioning and use it rather than being stuck in it
SwanSongstress: boris why dont you give the combat a rest and hear phil
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Boris, I do not pretend to be a selfless person
SwanSongstress: he is speaking of transformation
Seawnds: but Edward says don't use "how" . .
Seawnds: the word how
SwanSongstress: another restriction sea
devenroy: why not to be here and now
reikispirit: do you do self hypnosis phil?
SwanSongstress: for reasons we dont know
devenroy: why to be there?
SwanSongstress: lol
Seawnds: yes
boris badinov: whats wrong swan couldnt answer my question to you?>
devenroy: somewhere over the rainbow
boris badinov: scroll back swan
SwanSongstress: boris i will answer any interesting question you offer
SwanSongstress: so get with the program
boris badinov: scroll back then swanny
SwanSongstress: that wasnt interesting boris and your obvious fight-seeking is boring
too
boris badinov: thats a poor way to avoid a question songstree
Ebbing_tide: phil, the next thought you have see where it is taking you
SwanSongstress: hi nlight
SwanSongstress: light, even
LIGHT 101: hi swan
LIGHT 101: ty deven
Ebbing_tide: hiya light
LIGHT 101: hey ebbing
devenroy: yes seawnds
SwanSongstress: me too sea
devenroy: how r u light
boris badinov: your conditioned more than anyone seawinds
Ebbing_tide: doesn't mane any of that stops sea
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: One can think while not taking it seriously - not being
attached to it as real
Ebbing_tide: mean
boris badinov: boring
LIGHT 101: good ty deven
devenroy: good
Phil Monty: bliss is something
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Bliss is the illusion of something, IMO
reikispirit: bliss is different from what Edward speaks of
Ebbing_tide: the removal of the illusion
Ebbing_tide: yes phil
love-ology: have to go to work , have a good day/ night all
Seawnds: lol
boris badinov: cat got your tongue swan
LIGHT 101: i dont see it so much as the removal, rather, the observation of reactions
to aspects of conditioning
boris badinov: no good asking you questions you cant answer swan
Seawnds: interesting . . so maybe thoughts are fast . . . they are there even beyond
the formation of words . . .but is there really anything before thought?
Phil Monty: reiki: I think Edward speaks of a place called death...not physically
though
boris badinov: ?ive got your mo swan
reikispirit: yes phil ever been in sichort state?
LIGHT 101: it is the preconceived thoughts which often generate reactions
Phil Monty: not that I can recall...reiki
fred_kent: well spoken Ebb
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Death, IMO, is self-abnegation
Ebbing_tide: ty fred
Phil Monty: Reiki: psychotic*....lol
Ebbing_tide: fear that isn'
Ebbing_tide: t real
Phil Monty: what is a sichort state?
Ebbing_tide: that's our conditioning that has us trapped
boris badinov: ask swan
reikispirit: that is like a death the deepest form of hypnosis you feel nothing
and you are not aware it is almost like being asleep but you are not and heart rate
slows way down
Phil Monty: ok
LIGHT 101: every knock at the door does not generate fear
Seawnds: is fear necessarily undesirable
Seawnds: maybe there could be a reason to fear
LIGHT 101: fear of what
Phil Monty: Reiki: however even a deep state of hypnosis is a state..which is something...yeah?
boris badinov: it is not fear it is awareness?
Seawnds: so our mind looks at possibilities . . for our survival
reikispirit: it is a label we give it phil...lol
LIGHT 101: yep ebbing....
reikispirit: but it is very real
Phil Monty: yes ebbing
Ebbing_tide: ?
boris badinov: knowing the thoughts of others?
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: There is really no such condition as a deep state of hypnosis.
That is a language game promoted by the media. Hypnosis is nothing more than suggestibility.
We are, to an extent, continually hypnotized
boris badinov: not hypnotized conditioned
reikispirit: well moshe I have had surgery with it so it is more than what the media
puts out they lie alot..
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Conditioning operates through suggestibility ("hypnosis")
boris badinov: exactly
Phil Monty: Moshe: perhaps not a language game as defined by Witgenstein.....but
more a story we have created based on conditioning
LIGHT 101: i have hundreds of redbacks here, however, i dont fear them
boris badinov: get the point moshe
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Reiki, yes, that is similar to biofeedback
Seawnds: that is a phobia . .and ungrounded fear
devenroy: yes seawnds
reikispirit: and hypnotherapy can do away with conditioning as well
Seawnds: as opposed to fears that may be justified
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Phil, I would suggest that the stories we tell *are* our
conditioning or socialization. However, I don't think that Wittgenstein would disagree
boris badinov: exactly moshe
reikispirit: no Moshe as you are not there just like what anathesia does you feel
nothing,
Phil Monty: ok....Witgenstein was a beery old swine....lol
boris badinov: moshe is right
Seawnds: exactly dev
Ebbing_tide: you act immediately in the now
Ebbing_tide: you don't have time to think
devenroy: cool yes
Phil Monty: Ebbs: how long does thinking take?
boris badinov: moshe swan songstress is a perfect example of your analogy
LIGHT 101: brb
Ebbing_tide: we are always thinking phil
devenroy: lol seawnds
Phil Monty: yes ebing
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Thinking is the definition of an ego-state, IMO.
devenroy: yeah
boris badinov: correct moshe
Ebbing_tide: yes mosh
boris badinov: are you ever wrong moshe?
Phil Monty: Moshe: imo..the ego state is a metaphor...which is open to interpretation
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Boris, only on alternate Thursdays
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Phil, all words are, IMO, metaphorical
Seawnds: yes . . .and you see the possibilies of going too fast
devenroy: dog says "shut up"
boris badinov: so in between you have no ego moshe
devenroy: ?
fred_kent: lol dev
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Boris, I detect a fairly significant ego in myself
Seawnds: no, Ebb
Seawnds: sorry , i don't grasp the difference
boris badinov: so do i as i do swan
Phil Monty: yes Moshe.......I agree....all words are open for interpretation, therefore
a metahor
Seawnds: deja vu . . . having already seen
boris badinov: significant
boris badinov: currymuncher
Seawnds: yes
devenroy: yes.... look into dogs eyes and shake ur tail
devenroy: joking
boris badinov: you already do ebbing
boris badinov: its not allusion ebbing
devenroy: yes seawnds
boris badinov: awareness ebbing
Ebbing_tide: we all live in a paronoid state without realizing it
Phil Monty: Ebbing for me it is about living in the NOW, but visiting the future
and the past....whilst "being"
devenroy: not really ebbing
boris badinov: bullshit ebb
boris badinov: if you live in the now you cant expect to live in the future ebbing
Ebbing_tide: yes phil, same, without being trapped in the illusion of what is
Phil Monty: yes
Ebbing_tide: boris in the now I can plan my day out
Ebbing_tide: and yet there is no trap to it
boris badinov: but when you plan your looking to the future arent you ebb?
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: or buy a good b-b gun
Ebbing_tide: boris there is only now
boris badinov: you didnt answer the question ebb
LIGHT 101: if i believed the news as presented in the media, i would not be flying
in a couple of weeks
Seawnds: yes . . .there's phobia and paranoia . . .but also a legitimate looking
ahead and thinking about possibilities
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Hey, dogs have to eat, too
devenroy: lol moshe
devenroy: hahahahaha
LIGHT 101: fear would take tis hold and i would hibernate
JD9587: yes light
LIGHT 101: sea, yes i see your point
boris badinov: but you said you were pplanning the rest of the day thats the futureisnt
it?
Seawnds: ty light
Phil Monty: Yes Ebbing...........I hate it when I agree with you
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Hiya, Light. (I am Mark/dialectix, btw)
boris badinov: crap ebb
LIGHT 101: however this is a reasoned response, rather than a paranoid response
devenroy: hey dialectix long time no see
LIGHT 101: hey dial ?
fred_kent: lol phil , does you good!!
devenroy: how are u man
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Yeah, I know
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Not half bad, u?
boris badinov: tell her moshe
Seawnds: you bring the past with you as you go into your moment
devenroy: not half good moshe
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: tell her what?
boris badinov: ebb this is crap
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: devenroy, then the other half is what is to be focused
on
Phil Monty: Ebbing: can you define "NOW"
devenroy: yeah i also see it like that moshe
boris badinov: ?
boris badinov: lol
LIGHT 101: it all depends what your previous thoughts are....if u have an ingrained
fear which is paramount in your thinking process, then u will be more reluctant
to answer the door
LIGHT 101: ?
LIGHT 101: brb
devenroy: dogs wants to go to pee
boris badinov: the past makes us strong for the future seawinds
Phil Monty: the past is our conditioning, our schema
LIGHT 101: i have been held up by masked gunmen who entered my home....yet....i
leave my doors open.....
LIGHT 101: lol
LIGHT 101: go figure
reikispirit: that had to be tramatic for you seawnds
devenroy: lol@seawnds
devenroy: yes
boris badinov: unless you become a monk seawinds
Seawnds: i was never really mugged though, reiki . . lol
Seawnds: though i do mug in the mirror sometimes
reikispirit: ahahaha
reikispirit: then why think that way when you answer the door..
boris badinov: the shaolin will lend you a robe seawinds
boris badinov: phil monty arent you planning for the future?
Phil Monty: yes boris...for sure
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: IMO, past, present ("now"), and the future are
all language games. None of them exist
boris badinov: ?
boris badinov: ?
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Nothing exists anywhere
reikispirit: like right now I could be setting goals for the future but I work in
the now towards them
boris badinov: ?
devenroy: lol moshe
Ebbing_tide: phone
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: IMO, if a thing exists, it exists, but how can it exist
in an abstraction?
boris badinov: ?
Phil Monty: brb...George is drinking out of the toilet bowl...better give him some
water
reikispirit: ahahaha phil
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: lol
devenroy: george bush?
boris badinov: phil is conserving water and taking it out on his dog
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Yeah, that I would believe
boris badinov: is that why youre all funny
devenroy: nice
Seawnds: hmm . . .try new jersey
Seawnds: lol
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Just add plenty of ice to water, and even the most disgusting
water will be tolerable
Phil Monty: lol
boris badinov: smelcahol
LIGHT 101: we dont have much water here right now.....the water storage is down
to 3% capacity....sure tastes muddy
devenroy: if beer is water
LIGHT 101: so we drink bottled water
Phil Monty: where are you from Light?
devenroy: yes
LIGHT 101: aus
Phil Monty: ok
boris badinov: jd has blown up like a goldfish
Phil Monty: where in Aus?
LIGHT 101: nsw
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: or prostate
LIGHT 101: on the border
Phil Monty: Albury?
LIGHT 101: u got it
LIGHT 101: lol
Phil Monty: lol
LIGHT 101: now how did u get that from.....on the border...lol
LIGHT 101: ?
Phil Monty: the famous border town is Albury/Wondonga
boris badinov: i will get bracks onto phil
Phil Monty: wodonga*
boris badinov: and the rspca
devenroy: wc cs
CreativeSilence: hi
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: CreativeSilence, sounds like a Quaker name
boris badinov: phil does your dog piss into the toliet bowl as well?
Phil Monty: boris: working on that
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: I want to see a dog sit on the toilet like a normal human
being
boris badinov: phils working on that too
boris badinov: teach him to piss on your enemies phil
Ebbing_tide: bye folks, daughter has arrived
boris badinov: cats are selfish comrad
devenroy: bye ebbing
Phil Monty: c'ya ebbing
reikispirit: lol
CreativeSilence: i dictate the words and my dog types it ...if he is not doing the
dishes
boris badinov: what does moew mean reiki?
reikispirit: feed me
Phil Monty: lol
boris badinov: LOL
Phil Monty: this conversation is too dangerous
Seawnds: lol@creative
CreativeSilence: lol
Seawnds: dogs are from mars . . .cats are from venus
Phil Monty: lol
Seawnds: . . . or is that men and women
reikispirit: lol
reikispirit: other way around seawnds...lol
devenroy: if man are like dogs the women are pillars
reikispirit: well I am a dog then...lol
devenroy: on which dog pees
boris badinov: REIKI FEEDS HER CAT THE NEIGBOURS DOGS
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Precisely. I thoroughly reject sex and gender as objective
realities
Seawnds: actually . . i'm going to play with my doll now
boris badinov: THE LATEX ONE
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: However, what we call men are often socialized to be like
cats (avoidant). What we call call women are often socialized to be more like dogs
(close and intimate).
Seawnds: interesting moshe
reikispirit: it is about learning how to communicate with the opposite sex and see
the difference to understand them.
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Seawnds, just stream of consciousness ?
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: The idea of two sexes is a popular fiction
reikispirit: read that book some 22 yrs ago
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Some scholars say there are 5 sexes
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: other scholars say there is only one sex
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: It is all language games
Seawnds: i thought so!
Seawnds: lol
Seawnds: women seem to be so much more verbal
Seawnds: so that's why i can't walk and chew gum
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: We see things according to the questions we ask
reikispirit: yes and more intuitive
reikispirit: that is what I have observed
reikispirit: and what I have experienced as well being female
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: I disagree with the reification of women or men
reikispirit: they can sense things more
CreativeSilence: lol
reikispirit: have a knowing of things
reikispirit: ahahaha seawnds
Phil Monty: your a suck...seawnds...lol
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: So-called women are taught to ask certain questions. They
then see things according to those questions.
CreativeSilence: because she put it there
CreativeSilence: lol
devenroy: they take it with them
devenroy: lol yes
Moshe Aron ben Hesh Loeb: Because they are raised to ask different questions than
so-called men
reikispirit: that cheese is hiding from you tellingyou to stay away from it not
good for you...lol
CreativeSilence: well i rather have a women eyeball me than a man
posted at 01:09:57 AM by Dr. Mark A. Foster
Saturday,March 10,2007