SocioSphere Editorials

April 2002 - February 2009 Archive
Reflections on Religion, Current Events, and Other Subjects

Editorials Blog Index   |   SocioSphere™   |   MarkFoster.NETwork


Thursday,August 28,2008

Infallibility is divine authority or will.



posted at 03:10:32 PM by Dr. Mark A. Foster

Tuesday,August 19,2008

To me, energy healing techniques, like reiki and johrei, are magic and psychism. The distinction I make between the Baha'i Faith and magic (or psychism) is that, in the Baha'i Faith, one prays for healing (if it is God's Will) and consults persons who have studied "a scientific system of medicine." However, in magic, one claims to mentally and/or physically channel the healing power directly.

In terms of this paragraph from _Some Answered Questions_:

"The other kind of healing without medicine is through the magnetic force which acts from one body on another and becomes the cause of cure. This force also has only a slight effect. Sometimes one can benefit a sick person by placing one's hand upon his head or upon his heart. Why? Because of the effect of the magnetism, and of the mental impression made upon the sick person, which causes the disease to vanish. But this effect is also very slight and weak."

I might very well be wrong, but my reading of what He said is that the "magnetic force" between the bodies is more like giving physical comfort, much as I would put my hand on my mother's head and stroke it while she was in the hospital and close to her own death. I don't think He was referring to something magical, like reiki or johrei. We can all, it seems to me, relate to what He said. When we are suffering, physical connections (i.e., "magnetism") can create a favorable "mental impression."

It seems to me that, generally speaking, `Abdu'l-Baha was, including in His discussion of what may be close to psychosomatic healing and the "contagion of health" referring more to the direction or purpose of scientific research, not that His statements should be taken as scientific propositions or hypotheses.



posted at 11:22:05 PM by Dr. Mark A. Foster


State socialism would be control of the economy on behalf of the people. (There are many other types of socialism, too, which do not require state involvement.)
However, Trotsky pointed out that, in the USSR, government bureaucrats faired much better economically than the masses. For that reason, the Soviet Union was not socialist. I think that Trotsky's term, state capitalism, is quite accurate.

Many leftists, like myself, have read Marx. I know what he said and did not say, how his views evolved throughout his career, and so on. It is abundantly clear that he would not have approved of the Soviet system.



posted at 04:02:39 PM by Dr. Mark A. Foster

Sunday,August 10,2008

I was a Trotskyite a long time ago. I became disillusioned with Trotskyism at about the same time as I learned that American neoconservatism has Trotskyite (and Platonic) roots. These days, I favor the collectivization of national and transnational corporations, of local utilities, of medicine, housing, and law, and of all aspects of infrastructure currently in private hands.

I have no problem with private ownership of small local companies. However, they should, in my view, be carefully monitored by workers protection boards who have the right to seize those companies for improprieties.



posted at 01:42:18 AM by Dr. Mark A. Foster





Copyright © 2002- Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. All rights reserved.


Powered by Blog
Strongly Recommended!
Powered by NoteTab Pro