
|
The Methodology for The
MarkFoster.NETwork™ Cybersociology ![]() |
syn·chro·nous
Pronunciation: 'si[ng]-kr&-n&s, 'sin-
Function: adjective
Etymology: Late Latin synchronos, from Greek,
from syn- + chronos time
Date: 1669
1 : happening, existing, or arising at
precisely the same time
2 : recurring or
operating at exactly the same periods
3 :
involving or indicating synchronism
4 a :
having the same period; also : having the same
period and phase b : GEOSTATIONARY
5 :
of, used in, or being digital communication (as between
computers) in which a common timing signal is established
that dictates when individual bits can be transmitted, in
which characters are not individually delimited, and which
allows for very high rates of data transfer
Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary © 2002 (Online Edition)
asyn·chro·nous
Pronunciation: (")A-'si[ng]-kr&-n&s, -'sin-
Function: adjective
Date: 1748
1 : not synchronous
2 : of,
used in, or being digital communication (as between
computers) in which there is no timing requirement for
transmission and in which the start of each character is
individually signaled by the transmitting device
-
asyn·chro·nous·ly adverb
Merriam-Webster's Collegiate® Dictionary © 2002 (Online Edition)
Medium
plural usually media...a
channel or system of communication, information, or entertainment
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
The methodology is participant observational, content analytical, historical, phenomenological, and existential. Explorations of structurization processes on the Internet will be explored through active engagement in, and utilization of, online communications media. Structurization, discussed below, is taken as heuristics and, in the social construction of online lifeworlds, as praxis. For instance, one behavior to be explored is applied textual reasonings in situated settings.
The Internet will be regarded as a metasociety, analogous to the concept of virtual communities. It is, in other words, a society beyond individual societies and is structured entirely in the minds of its participants.
As philosophy of science, the project utilizes pragmatism (Thomas Kuhn and Richard Rorty):
[Richard] Rorty, something of a Pragmatist, brought together the works of
Davidson and Kuhn to form Pragmatism in accordance with the new focus
on language. His deflationary view of language runs along with his
expansionistic view of Pragmatism. Verifiability operates in
time-sectioned paradigms, thus lending itself to relativity in
"truth." More importantly, Rorty's gap between man and the world is
not to be overcome with language, leaving man and science permanently
separated from the actual condition of the world. This does not
bother Rorty; he sees it simply as a part of the human condition,
something that man has had to deal with since the beginning of time.
While his views are intriguing, Rorty appears to have moved away from
the foundation of traditional Pragmatism, placing and emphasis on
relativity and metaphysics rather than on strict verifiability.
http://organizations.oneonta.edu/philosc/abstracts01.html
and conventionalism:
Unlike conventionalism, a philosophy of science that regards
scientific laws and theories as freely chosen constructs that are
simply devised by the scientist for the purpose of describing
reality, Realism holds that laws and theories have determined and
real counterparts in things.
-- "Realism," Encyclopedia
Britannica
Structurization Theory™, the theoretical and metatheoretical orientation explored in this project, is designed as a sociological and metasociological counterpart to certain theologies of liberation. Its post-Marxism criticalizes the radical sociology of the 1960s and 1970s into the sociopolitical constructs of the twenty-first century and opposes the recent drift of much of the Left into a post-radical accommodationism with the capitalist intelligentsia.
From the standpoint of this revised framework, the coexistence of an engaged radical metatheory, expressive of religious or spiritual commitment, with a grounded sociological theory, averse to global capitalism and to the terrorisms, is posited. The requisite distinction lies in the juxtaposition of value and fact.
To the question, "Could the social world be arranged differently," the nominalist would reply in the affirmative. The volitional, for instance, is accidental, not essential. It is possible that we can deconstruct groups which are oppressive and construct liberatory ones.
Methodologically, religion and science must each operate within their own grounded spheres of authority, while respecting the other's core competencies. The alternative would be the development of contemporary social scientific versions of such monstrosities as Auguste Comte's Religion of Humanity and Felix Adler's Ethical Culture (making religion scientific), on the one hand, or Creation Science and Islámic science (making science religious), on the other.
The post-Marxism in the radical sociology of religions refers to an axiological and a teleological, not a propositional, revolutionary program for transformative social action. In other words, while the metatheoretical values and direction for this paper come, properly, from religion, not from social science, its theoretical foundations originate in social science, not in religion.
Given that the metatheory of Structurization Theory is inevitably rooted in the specific religious or spiritual hermeneutic of the individual sociologist, a reflexive sociology must be among its integral components. Dynamically, transmodern sociology can be both socially transformative and intensely personal.
A significant mode of reflexive praxis is voice. Personal forms of discourse which are socially, politically, and economically emancipatory are advocated. Accordingly, free speech must refer exclusively to such forms of self-expression as are fundamentally free of oppressive content and do not promote false consciousness. Society should educate its members to rigorously avoid establishmentarian language which champions the subjugation and enslavement of others.
As Structurization Theory is developed, it will incorporate various theoretical perspectives. These are discussed elsewhere on this site.
This project will use various forms of praxis, including opinion journalism.
For further information, see my paper entitled, An Anti-Terrorist Manifesto. This section of the present page is adopted from that paper.
For definntions of clinical sociology, sociological practice, and applied sociology, see my ClinicalSociology.com portal.