This paper will examine the monopolistic truth claims of various
religious fundamentalisms. These have been, and are continuing to be,
observed during an ethnographic, or participant-observational, field
study on Paltalk, an online multimedia chat service, via text,
microphone, and webcam.
The poststructural approach taken here will attempt to deconstruct
certain of the theological narratives witnessed on Paltalk into a
post-theological sociology; that is to say, a sociology of religions
which critiques all attempts at the reification of religious knowledge.
Points to cover:
- I have been working on the project since May, 2006, and am an
administrator in the room.
- Name of Room: The Great Debate Who is
Jesus
- It is one of the largest rooms in the
Christianity section of Paltalk (often the largest).
- Three room owners: two non-trinitarian
Christians and another with an unusual approach to trinitarianism
and a strong belief in extraterrestrial influence
- Room participants include persons from
a variety of religious backgrounds, including: fundamentalist
Christians, evangelical Christians, liberal Christians, Muslims,
Buddhists, UFO enthusiasts, Wiccans, Neopagans,
Bahá'ís, and others.
- Rules of the room: Everyone is allowed
to speak in here, regardless of beliefs... 3-4 min on mic if hands
are up, no personal attacks, no promoting religious material for
personal profit, no red text(unless you’re an admin), don’t use
ALL CAPS, don’t flood the room, don’t jump the mic, no yelling on
mic, don't question how admins run the room, no music/files unless
permission by admin...admins will use their discression and may
occasionally go beyond these rules.
- Many of the participants might be
categorized as "fundamentalists." For our purposes here, a
fundamentalist is defined as a person hostile, on the basis of
religious traditionalism, to one or more aspects of modernity or
postmodernity. Their characteristics may include intolerance, a
difficulty with relativity, absolute moral values, anti-scientific
thinking (believing in special creation or intelligent design).
- In this room, one of the more common
behaviors I observe is the repeated accusations of lying.
Differences of opinion are constructed as lying. When I have
challenged people on this label, most have responded by quoting
Psalms 116:11, "All men are liars." (The actual passage verse
reads in its entirety, "I said in my haste, All men [are] liars."
Obviously, those first five words may considerably alter what
the individual was writing.)
- Discuss the point of Structurization
Theory (nominalism, constructionism, particulars not real, names
or categories as abstractions or social constructions).
- Examine the room in the context of
Structurization Theory. Focus on differing constructions and
conflicts between room participants on their constructions.